Comments on: Viva Las Vegas!

By: Stu Mark

Stu Mark — Mon, 04 Jul 2005 03:30:22 +0000

I know this may seem rude, but I think that if she was writing while on a substance of some sort, well, I think she should keep taking that substance. If that means her liver has to do a little overtime, so be it.

Bon, actually it would seem that I owe you a Coke, as you seem to be calling Jinx on something that we did at the same time. Now, I’m a Pepsi man, but I’ll endorse the ingesting of liquids prepared by Coca-Cola Bottling.

By: Bon

Bon — Mon, 04 Jul 2005 02:08:02 +0000

OMG–Stu Mark–GET OUT OF MY HEAD! I hit the COMMENT link specifically to say, “Coco, I love ya… but were you drunk-blogging?” I do that, so I say that with no judgment whatsoever… but I’m just way sure you were tipsy-typing.

Now… Stu Mark… I owe you a Coke, right?

By: Stu Mark

Stu Mark — Fri, 01 Jul 2005 00:32:31 +0000

Second, why do they call Las Vegas a city? It’s just a bunch of casinos and the rest are buildings for the people that work in the casinos. There is *nothing* else going on there. Los Angeles, New York, these are cities.

By: Stu Mark

Stu Mark — Fri, 01 Jul 2005 00:31:03 +0000

First off, I’m a big-time fan of your blog, so don’t take this the wrong way, but… Were you drunk when you wrote this entry? Because it has a *way* different flavor than your standard entry. I loved it, it was completely fun and free-wheeling. So good on ya.

By: Fred

Fred — Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:58:03 +0000

Irony…I get that.

By: david

david — Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:57:52 +0000

I see you are enjoying LV as much as I did (or didn’t) when I was there. If I hear one more ‘ching ching ching’ of the slot machines …. I’ll just mad I tells ya!!!