Who in the world is Samantha Burns?

My site traffic has been up significantly* this month, despite anemic posting.

Most of it I owe to the hit-and-run gossip juiceheads coming from a particular celebrity board (note to all you looky-loos: yes, I really did kiss him—on the lips—and yes, there really were zero fireworks on either side). I can’t really count that because, like the geeks Merlin sent over back in October when I did a rare (but spicy) riff about my unbridled nerdlust, you don’t gain new readers from your random meanderings, and pretty much all I do on communicatrix is randomly meander. What can I say? Sometimes I like to talk about Sartre; sometimes I like to talk about my twat. Hey—who’s paying for bandwidth here?

Anyway, occasionally someone funny and smart and literate will stumble upon my messy playpen and dig it and tell a few people and maybe even grow my actual reader base, and that’s fantastico, dude. To ease the burden of clicking through the 80 billion links you’ll have to by the time communicatrix is a household word, Michael Blowhard is the most likely patient zero for this here website, sending the far more quality-consistent and popular Neil, who sent the equally far more quality-consistent and popular Brandon, who has already sent more readers my way than I can ever hope to repay him for in tequila or sexual favors. (See? Booze! Sex! Tortuous, English-major-gone-mad sentences full of mismatched words, references and phrases! No wonder I am shunned like sushi at the Sizzler: I’m so incongruous, I can only mean trouble down the road!**)

Regardless of my lack of stickiness***, I still thrill to see those quality leads show up in my stats. You would, too, if your schizo blog cast such a wide, useless net. No one of substance reads me, but by gum, I am at the top of the Google rankings when anyone is looking for the 411 on NSA or the human organ that Georgia O’Keeffe based all those flower paintings on. Still, some things completely confound me.

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Samantha Burns.

Somehow, I wound up on Miss Burns’ ‘random bloglog’, which, as she states in her highly comprehensive FAQ, “used to be part of a private blogroll for exploring new parts of the blogsphere, but several readers asked for it to be made public, and voila, it’s now public.”

Firstly, I cannot fathom having “several” readers ask me for anything. I’m lucky if one or two of you post about your fantastic poker site. Secondly, I can’t imagine myself in the RSS reader next to:

  1. Britpoppa, who closed up his gossip shop in May of this year
  2. Marc, whose ‘Messages’ bear the tagline “trying to keep up with God’s worldwide wonders”
  3. Tony, who moved his After Grog Blog to a new URL in May of 2003 (what is it about May, I wonder?)
  4. Taranne, who moved her whole Rue to a new URL a year ago (I think…it’s in French)

But thirdly—and most importantly—I couldn’t figure out where Samantha Burns came from. She’s been around since July and already she’s a Large Mammal in the TLB food chain, linked out the ass on Technorati and a finalist for Best Canadian Blog in the Weblog Awards. And while she is quite adorable (see photo, above), it’s not like she sits around pissing off liberals or yakking about her twat.

I think I will just have to get down with the fact that, if anything, I’m the tortoise in this blog race****. Perhaps it is due to my horrible coding skills: I don’t know how to make those fancy Javascript links that have my imprimatur in them even as they direct people elsewhere. Also, I have this little focus problem. As in, I can’t focus on this blog enough to come up with a cohesive theme, much less a marketing strategy.

Or maybe it’s really true that I’m just here for the beer—the blogging equivalent of ‘beer’ being ‘freedom to write whatever the hell I feel like’.

That’s bullshit, of course. I want my micro-brand-Oprah empire just like everyone else in this Oklahoma land rush we call the blogosphere. But after 10 years of writing ad copy and 3 more writing fascist sketch comedy, formats give me hives and self-promotion feels too much like a busman’s holiday.

I pay the price, of course: my little ditties may draw raves and earn me trips to Montreal, but my soapbox sketches still clear the theater.

Ah, well. You two are still here with me, right? Right?

Shit.

“Hello…Samantha?…”

xxx
c

*These things are relative, Chuckles. I’m wagering my former writing partner, Rick Crowley, will be able to eat me twice over in TTLB by the end of the year.

**I had really hoped to squeeze in a sneeze bar reference, but that paragraph was getting ridiculous even by my decidedly loopy standards.

***Yes, I’m reading The Tipping Point. As well as Blink, that Suze Orman book, Found, Getting Things Done (again) and the pertinent content from the New Yorker dating back to J-U-L-Y of 2004. Don’t ever let anyone tell you my eyes aren’t bigger than my stomach.

****Although recent reconfigurings in the TLB knocked me down from a brief
high of Flappy Bird to a shameful low of crunchy crustaceonness.

NOTE: This post originally uploaded on December 13th at 9:15am, but had to be back-dated since, as usual these days, TypePad status is SNAFU.

TOPICS: , , , , , .

8 Comments, Comment or Ping

  1. What are you talking about, you can’t imagine several readers asking you for anything? I recall, on at least eight separate occasions, asking you for something about white sweatpants. And I wasn’t alone.

    My call remains unanswered.

  2. Yeah, well, take it up with Mr. Sweatpants, Rick Crowley. I’m using you all as leverage; I have no real power.

  3. “than I can ever hope to repay him for…”

    pfft. wrong again, colleen. you can easily repay me with quickie and a shot of cuervo. hell, i’ll settle for the tequila and knee to the groin.

    debt. repaid.

    besides, mentioning me in the same breath with michael and neil? i think it is i who owe you.

    so what’ll it be? knee to the groin and a vodka bull?

  4. Actually, SB (or more acurately, her tech handler) is part of the reason for the whole TTLB shakeup. Check out NZB’s comments here:

    http://www.truthlaidbear.com/archives/2005/11/23/open_posts_inline_trackbacks.php

    (I forget, can commenters use HTML on your blog?)

    (Excerpt: I believe the Ecosystem has created at least part of the motivation to do open trackbacks, and this troubles me. My goal has always been to reflect, as accurately as possible, what is truly popular and interesting in the ’sphere — not distort it by creating bogus incentives for blogs to create automatic links to each other with no real meaning. If you don’t believe me about creating the incentive, check out the Open Trackback Alliance.)

    By pure serendipity, I linked to her back in August when she was at 14855 (Flippery Fish). I’m not sure what she’s done different from anyone else except figure out how to game the system. My link:

    http://newsonthemarch.blogspot.com/2005/08/people-spouting-howdy-neighbor.html

  5. Hello again KaneCitizen!

    I remember that back in August. I was the one whom posted the hello back :)

    Just so others have a bit of background on TTLB (for those who care), the reference is to OTA, or the Open Trackback Alliance. It’s not intended to game the system but used as a method for smaller bloggers to promote articles on other bloggers site (i.e. a method to get noticed). It *had* the side effect of directly raising the ranks of those whom participated in the TTLB.

    NZ Bear used it as an example as some people were using it effectively an instruction manual on how to game the system. I have communicated to NZ Bear about the issue and proposed to him the rel=”nofollow” trick to prevent those whom would game it (which he is now using).

    Also, Sam was in the top of the large mamals long before OTA so her rank is not gamed and NZ Bear now discounts those kinds of links so they should no longer be a factor in the scoring. Just wanted to clarify - not that anyone probably cares much ;)

    And yes, Sam’s blog is fairly new. She does the writing and I do the technical stuff to keep her blog running (and add those features like the random blogroll)

    Mr. big
    (Sam’s technical Igor)

  6. Oh and thanks for letting me know about the dead links. I’ve been meaning to clean out the list. I’ve cleaned out many already - for some reason it picked a set of really bad links that time.

  7. Hey, your link from Merlin dragged at least my sorry self over here. I probably won’t count for the smart and literate part of your readership, but at least I’m occasionally funny.

    Absolutely love your random meanderings, because that’s pretty much what I do on my blog, too - except I’m so tech-laced that I manage to keep my readership really low. They come for the gadgets only :(

    Anyway, just wanted to say Hi!

  8. Oh, brando. You really know how to make a girl melt…

    KC - it’s been a week of freaky coincidences, things turning inside of themselves and computers not working. Is Mercury retrograde or something?

    Come to think of it, I did remember reading your TTLB post, which is where I probably first heard of SB. I’ve nothing against her or Mr. Big (hi!) personally; it was just a huge letdown to have my specially-bookmarked blog listed with a bunch of moribund links.

    And Robert, thanks for piping up. All geeks, smart and stupid, welcome here. Although most of the smart ones give it a wide berth. (Me, I’m still trying to figure out this permalink-porting nightmare…)



or enter your email address:


Lijit Search