Returning to love, again and again

I don’t cry at the drop of a hat anymore—two solid years of crying brought on by a Method acting class finally worked that out of my system—but I am still easily moved by “heart messages.”

In other words, I don’t cry at commercials very often, but show me who you really are and I’m a goner.

I cried in the car last week—in full-on, westbound at evening hour traffic—listening to an NPR show on Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

I cried in the middle of the BlogHaus at SXSW, talking to Liz Strauss about personal branding (and not out of frustration with the concept getting co-opted by tools.)

I cried more when The BF’s dog, Arnie, came to comfort me because I was already crying.

One of the great lessons you learn with a good acting teacher (and no, she doesn’t have to teach the Method) is that everything is right there, all the time. Or that it can be. It can also be hell breaking through to the point where you recognize that Everything Is Right There All the Time: ask anyone who had to sit through most of my scenes in class for the first three years.

But once you establish that access, it’s hard to go back. This is neither a good thing nor a bad one: it just is. You will feel stuff, easily and quickly, all the time. In a way, it’s like a return to a childlike way of being, only with all the acquired consciousness and skills and history of adulthood. You know the truth of a situation right away, or really quickly, if you care to look. And sometimes, even if you don’t.

I’m no expert, but it seems reasonable to me that this is why a lot of people turn to things that muffle the truth. There’s the really obvious stuff (drugs, alcohol) and the slightly less-obvious stuff: TV, internet, video games, exercise; pretty much anything that is taken to a level of obsession. Compulsive levels of things: shopping, gambling, sex, smoking, cleaning, etc. That old saw about moderation is there for a reason. Even moderation, done excessively, can be an issue: would you trust someone who never, ever cut loose? Or would you wonder if maybe there were some Issues-with-a-Capital-”I” brewing there?

The older I get, and the more things I’m confronted with, the more I realize that most stuff can be addressed with a one-two punch: take it in and love it up.

This seems to be the foundation of a lot of spiritual practice. Meditation is observation plus detachment, which is really creating the space for love: a way to not react with reptile brain, but from a higher or deeper place of compassion.

The Work” of Byron Katie boils down to that, too: it’s a process for shifting thinking (and being) by approaching information differently, i.e. with love. (Note: I’m not a Byron Katie scholar or even a student, but I did research The Work several years ago while exploring modalities for change.)

Talk therapy, when done right, does the same thing: it helps you view things through a different lens than you’re used to, and part of the reason it works is the safe, compassionate space provide by the therapist.

What I’ve come to, again and again, is that love is at the heart of it all (you’ll pardon the pun), but for myriad reasons, we forget that and need reminding. Our funky reptile hardwiring so quick to shift us into danger mode, for one. Life, for another: have you looked around and seen how complex things have gotten lately? How many of us there are? How many languages we speak, or more accurately, that we don’t speak?

In times of extreme crisis—the death of a loved one, on a small scale, or a tragedy like tsunami, Katrina, 9/11, on a large one—the first, immediate reaction is a falling away of everything and a feeling of tenderness. Think outflows of cash, help, feeling. Hell, here in L.A., people actually waved people into traffic for a full two weeks.

The problem, of course, is staying in that feeling. There’s a reason those super-compassionate monks and world champions of mind-training have to spend so much time meditating: staying in compassion is not a natural thing. Frankly, I’m still unconvinced that it’s an entirely good thing—but then, of course I’d say that: I’m not highly evolved enough to, yet.

What I have been doing lately is examining the reactions I have and seeing how they make me feel. Righteous indignation? Umbrage? Not so good. Plus, when I react from these, the reaction it sets off in others is really not so good.

When I can take one motherfucking goddamned moment to step back and breathe, however, the shift is remarkable. I feel better. I can usually interact with someone in a way that, if it doesn’t make them feel better, usually doesn’t make them feel worse. Nothing works all the time. But when I’m really, truly doing it—when I’m working clean, not working it to game the situation—it works most of the time. And my own peace of mind is increased every time.

This is a more open-ended musing than I usually post, and for an obvious reason: I’m at the beginning of this particular road. As such, I’m really curious to know what your experience is in acting from that space of love: when it’s easy, when it’s hard, and particularly, what practices have helped you get there. Some people seem to have been born to it—my paternal grandmother is one of those people whom you honestly couldn’t imagine thinking unkindly towards anyone, much less acting that way. But most of us aren’t Betty.

So…how do you do it? How are you doing it? Who has taught you, and what have you learned? Inquiring minds—and hearts—want to know…d

xxx
c

Image by jpmccluskey via Flickr, used under a Creative Commons license.

TOPICS: , .

12 Comments, Comment or Ping

  1. This is a beautiful post and exactly the kind of thing I needed to read today :-)

  2. communicatrix

    Thank you, Dave. Felt a little funny about posting it…which probably/usually means it’s a good thing I did.

  3. I work in a manufacturing facility and there ain’t a lot of love goin’ around. Quite the opposite actually. But recently, a co-worker inexplicably passed away, and I was totally floored when our staff came up with a surprisingly large sum of money to give to the family. These are *factory workers* that came up with that money. I was so proud of being a part our crew.

    To sum it up, I believe in *tough* love. I think society is just too polite. By keeping it real, you are “showing people who you really are” and this is more than love. There’s a great line from a movie that goes, “Love is just love.” Confronting reality, I think, is the greater end; granted extending love and connecting with others has a lot to do with that.

    Having said that, I admit that it can pretty tough to get through those ‘This I Believe’ stories!

  4. Thanks for this conversation. I call it that deliberately, because that’s how it felt. Beautifully written words from one heart to another set down here to be found. Thanks, too, for calling me over.

    I remember our conversation warmly.

    Even more this extension of it brought me to remember pieces of myself I’ve been looking to reclaim this week, this moment. Friends often have that effect. Is it their words or the trust they inspire?

  5. Blogrdoc - Good story. The peoples, they will surprise you now & then.

    I hear you on the rest, but it’s complicated. To come at something from a place of love does not mean being bullshitty or someone/thing you’re not. Compassion is a thing to aspire to; the most annoying thing about a lot of new age philosophy is the troweling on of P.C. goodness over the truth. Poor truth! What did it do to deserve that?

    Lots of times, people don’t get past the first step (”Where am I right now?”); lots of other times, people don’t even *know* there’s a first step. Neither is a particularly great place to be in, unless you’re one of those naturally good people, and then it only works as long as you’re able to handle whatever conflict is thrown at you.

    Like I said, complicated. Interesting, though.

    Liz - Such a lovely conversation deserves another that will live on. Thank you again—for both.

  6. Its the “war” between the mind and the heart your talking about, to which do we listen? I try and have been taught to listen to my heart as best I can cos the heart will always find the things that connect us together, whereas the mind will keep sorting, dividing and judging us into being separate - the crux of our combined human misery - that we feel separate and alone.

    What you said about acting from reaction is very true, its a survival mode way of acting that grows from lack of awareness of our own thoughts and motives, it is often very unhelpful.

    What you are touching on here is a much higher way of meditation of which the cross legged kind is only a beginning. To take up the meditative thread of living and follow its loving impulse and follow that as best you can. But its often very difficult to do, because that thread doesn’t always conform to the set of rules many agree are right or wrong ways of living. Suddenly you have to be true to yourself, which is the highest true-ness, not the true-ness of a set of learned rules.

    Some people you come across will understand immediately what you represent and you’ll find true friends, others will never comprehend your motives. You plod on, its fascinating, the best thing is to keep focusing on what you want to create with this love and never lose sight of that.

    The thing with love, is no matter how messy and awful life gets, to keep
    persisting with it, not to give up on it, keep focusing on it. Thats the essence of every meditative practice ever taught.

    Thanks for your thoughts on love, and love to you.

  7. Sweet, brave woman,
    Re this newest remarkable post of yours, consider reading a book I just finished:
    The Brain That Changes Itself

    your friend and fan
    Kare

  8. communicatrix

    Putting it on the list, sister. Thanks!

  9. In answer to your question, 2 books came to mind: The Four Agreements; and Cesar’s Way: The Natural, Everyday Guide to Understanding & Correcting Common Dog Problems.

    The former gets a bit too new agey for me at times, but the 4 agreements are sound (Be impeccable with your word. Don’t take anything personally. Don’t make assumptions. Always do your best.). Not always easy in application which I wrote some about here

    The most useful thing I took away from the book is probably that establishing I’m right (and hence someone else is wrong) is not always important or helpful.

    The dog book may seem an odd choice, but he talks a lot about calm-assertiveness as the energy needed to lead a pack. Since people live/work in packs, a lot of the group energy dynamic info applies to humans too.

    There’s also recognizing what’s actually driving someone else’s behavior. A repeating exercise I did in a directing class (and you’ve most likely done for an acting class) helped me get better at telling what someone is actually doing.

  10. communicatrix

    Claire - You know, from the little I know of each, those are great suggestions.

    I liked The Four Agreements - simple, clean, and you could spend the rest of your life working on it. Perfect meditative stuff. And while I read a different book by Cesar Millan, I noted a lot of things in there that seemed kind of…applicable to other circumstances. Dealing with people who are hot in the moment, who are really enmired in their Shit, is a lot like dealing with animals: they don’t have the distance to see things, and they react from their lowest-common-denominator brain.

    Oddly enough, I made it through my entire acting career without personal exposure to the Meisner technique, which is what I think you’re describing in that post. (And for the record, anyone who’s interested in some good writing should go check out those posts. Our Claire is no slouch in the self-observation dept.)

  11. Thank you for the kind words.

    I’m not sure if that exercise was part of the Meisner technique, but that sounds right. There’s a lot of great stuff within acting exercises. I often enjoyed those more than performing.

  12. communicatrix

    It may not be pure Meisner, but I’m pretty sure it would be based on it. That was a foundational tool of the Meisner technique.

    Agreed on the class vs. performance thing. Realizing I didn’t *have* to perform anymore was a huge weight lifted off me. My friend, Tony, says (re: acting) you “do it ’til you’re done.” And of course, there’s the old saw about only doing it at all if you absolutely have to. It’s a tough row to hoe, vocation-wise.



or enter your email address: