Down came the hammer

cscope0904.jpg You can't be cavalier about it, that's the lesson chronic illness teaches you about health.

Again. And again. And again.

I spent the first 41 years of my life powering through crisis; throw enough coffee/nicotine/man-hours at it, and there's no problem you can't solve. I've spent the last three unlearning those bad habits.

It was a sunny, crisp day here in L.A., and I had all kinds of ideas about how I was going to spend it.

I ended up spending most of it resting. And reading. And playing a little piano. And resting some more. Finally, I gave up all notions of productivity and headed over to The BF's for a little,

Well, there are some things that even tired people with chronic illnesses like to do.

I wanted to do a lot of things today that I didn't, including pour coffee on the problem. But the days of doing that are behind me.

Here's hoping there are some of those better days ahead of me.

xxx c

Photo of my (pink & healthy) colon taken in September, 2004

TAGS: , ,

Quotation of the Day: "Have you been reading my diary?" Edition

"There are thousands of reasons why people write blogs. But it seems tome the biggest reason that drives the bloggers I read the most is, we're all looking for our own personal global microbrand. That is the prize. That is the ticket off the treadmill. And I don't think it's a bad one to aim for."

Hugh "cartoons drawn on the back of business cards" MacLeod, on why he do that voodoo that he do so well

TAGS: , , , ,

How to score online (or dramatically improve your odds, anyway)

heartshotOne of the delights of having a blog is that it serves as a beacon in the night for lost and wayward souls. That, and spectres from my sordid past, up late, Googling of an evening. I've reconnected with a number of intimates over the past year, which pleases me no end. My New York boyfriend emailed me just yesterday; noting that I'd had extensive experience and some (ahem) success in the online arena, he asked if I'd be up for vetting his online profile and offering tweaking advice. A fixer-upper addict from way back, I jumped at the chance, especially since it would afford me the opportunity (oh, hell...the excuse) to lay out some of my general thoughts on successful online hook-ups.

WHERE TO GO

First off, I'm leery of Match. It's a real lowest-common-denominator website, so while you'll cast a wide net, you're likely to wind up with a good deal of flotsam & jetsom in it.

As I've mentioned on the blog, back in my datin' days, I liked Spring St. Networks (The Onion, Salon, etc) personals the best. They've since changed their pricing structure and in doing so, ruined a lot about what was loose and vaguely counter-culture about it so I don't know what their dating pool is like now, but if you're looking for someone like me, I'd more likely be there than match, matchmaker, tickle, etc. I did like their questionnaire far, far better than any of the others', and thought it brought out the quirk in everyone.

As for eHarmony, after two at-bats I can safely say that they're freaks. I won't even link to them, because no one who reads communicatrix on a regular basis is going to have any luck there.

On the other hand, if you've accepted the Lord Jesus Christ as your personal savior, you might do quite well in that arena.

WHAT TO SAY

There are specifics to be addressed in anyone's profile, but there are commonalities that work across the board in online dating. Don't try to reinvent the wheel; or, to mix metaphors, at least understand the rules of grammar before you get creative about breaking them.

1. When in doubt, go with humility.

You're smart and accomplished! You make decent scratch! You're fit and interesting!

To say so is, at the worst, sudden death, and at the least unforgiveably dull, which is almost sudden death. Find clever, creative ways of showing that. Be secure in the knowledge that the girl of your dreams will be able to read between the lines. Be equally secure in the knowledge that if you toot your own horn, you will wind up with dates who are (or worse, a girlfriend who is) a colossal pain in the ass. Besides, if you're really articulate, shouldn't you be able to show rather than tell me? (And when I say "me," I mean someone like me; the communicatrix is very happily partnered.)

2. Lay off the (yawn) first person singular.

It's easy for a profile to turn into a laundry list where each item begins with "I", I like this, I hate that, I'm really good at this, I suck donkey dick when it comes to that. It's fine if your first (unpublished, un-uploaded) pass is full of "I"s because a first draft should be a sort of vomiting up on the page of everything you think you want to say. Your second (and third, and fourth) pass, however, should be about finessing and storytelling and captivating. Switch it up; get jiggy with the gerund! Spice things up with a question! 3. Unless you have a true Buddha-like nature, post a picture

Sometimes people don't want to post a picture because they really, truly are interested in the inside and want to keep ego out of the equation, focussing on those fine, inner qualities that make for a good partner.

Usually, however, not wanting to post a pic is motivated by one of two things:

(a) the poster is, for whatever reason, embarrassed by being online, feels vulnerable at the exposure putting him- or herself out there generates and wishes to retain some anonymity for the control it offers or...

(b) the poster is as ugly as a moldy stump in a bog

If you want to go the no-picture route, you will dramatically reduce the number of qualified responses you'll receive. Period. Most people want to see what they're getting. And if your argument is, "Well, I'm looking for someone like me, who feels the same way about posting a photo online that I do," that's dandy, go to eHarmony, with the rest of the homophobic sheeple who goosestep behind Herr Neil Clark Warren.

Remember, online dating is largely a numbers game (at least in the beginning stages of communication) and you need to generate the numbers to play. Even if you find someone whose picture appeals to you and whose prose stirs you, you still may not have that chemical "click" in person. You need to generate the good leads to close. For every lucky bastard like The BF who has the girl of his dreams email him within hours of his posting there are at 50 or 60 others whose profiles are moldering away on a server somewhere, slipping ever downward on the "fresh faces" continuum.

Which leads me to our next item...

4. Commit! Commit! Commit! (But be relaxed about it!)

Like most things in life, you'll get out of online dating (or dating, period) what you're willing to put into it. Dip a toe in the water and all you'll get is a wet toe.

So commit to the truth. Embrace that you have gone online because dammit, you're ready to meet someone, to open yourself up to the possibility of something real and great happening offline.

However, for the love of all that's holy, be cool about it. It's hard to define cool, but cool generally lays back and digs the scene. Cool is not pushy or demanding or, heaven forfend, desperate.

5. Keep your pickiness private

While it's fine to have preferences, really, you're better off letting them go, or at least keeping an open mind. Think of it this way: if you were in a bar, you wouldn't introduce yourself to people by saying, "Hi, I'm 6'2" and have multiple advanced degrees and have abs you could bounce a quarter off so I really don't like chicks who are short, fat and have only completed two years of college." You'd hang; you'd be polite. You'd be nice. You'd be cool (see #4).

I know this may seem to conflict with the whole Truth thing I'm always nattering on about, but really, it doesn't. With the exception of people who really want to procreate the old-fashioned way and are seeking same and/or perhaps certain members of 12-step programs, there's no need to start excluding people from the get-go with a race/income/whatever checklist.

If you're dead-set against it and feel you must post your do/don't list, be cool about other people doing the same. Don't get your undies in a bundle if that 23-year-old you emailed doesn't email you back, especially if she posted her own specs and you don't match them. I can't tell you how many emails I got from men who were 10 years outside of my very generous parameters (on both ends) because they (ahem) were sure they were the exception to the rule, since they looked (ahem) very young for their age. They didn't, and besides, I really wasn't interested in someone who was 20 years older (or younger) than I was. Which brings us to...

(6) Never, ever, ever say you look really young for your age

If you do, people can tell by looking at your picture. If you don't, you're worse off than if you'd kept your trap shut. And not having a picture posted doesn't make that kind of bloviating any more attractive.

SUMMARY

Online dating is no worse and, once you get used to it, possibly a little better than its offline counterpart. As with any new venture, I'd suggest thoroughly familiarizing yourself with it, the competition, especially, before taking the plunge. Read through profiles, see who you'd date if you were on the other side. Read what you can about those who've been there before you.

And dig deep for those old-time connections. You never know where you might cadge a little free coaching...

xxx c

Quotation of the Day: Zero-Sum Edition

"Philosophers have been very interested in such unstable attempts at cooperation which eventually break down and leave all participants worse off than they might otherwise be. (They've been baptized Prisoner's Dilemma situations.) What's of perennial fascination is that the breakdown is caused not by participants' failing to reason correctly about what would be in their self-interest, but rather precisely by their correct reasoning about the situation. Reasoning well can leave one less well off than one might otherwise have been. And such a situation attracts philosophers like moths to a flame." , Alexander George, in an answer to an ethical question about traffic, on AskPhilosophers.com

TAGS: ,

Book review: Requiem for a Dream

I was introduced to Hubert Selby, Jr. via the movies, specifically the 1989 film adaptation of his debut novel, Last Exit to Brooklyn. Politely put, that movie beat the crap out of me. As I staggered out of the theater, my faux-cosmopolitan self reduced to a sorry tangle of nerve endings, I remember thinking this probably wasn't the best movie to have suggested for a sunny Saturday outing with Dad. The joke, however, was on me: Dad had known exactly what he was getting into; he'd read Last Exit when it came out, in 1964. When I was three.

I felt the same way, jangly, tense, vaguely ill, after seeing the 2000 film version of Requiem for a Dream, so much so that it took five years and running into a $1 used-paperback copy of the book at a thrift store to get me to give it a maybe. Because that's what I do with the "maybes", stick them on an ever-growing, three-dimensional "to read" list somewhere near the bed. Mostly, they molder away unread until they're trundled back to the mouth end of the thrift store (or sometimes, the used-book store, where they pay me in more books I'll never have time enough to read). But this kept nagging and nagging at me; what sort of source material inspires a director to do that on the screen? How do you make despair and addiction and wild-eyed, groundless hope so real on the page that someone else can translate it so perfectly into a completely different medium?

Or is Darren Aronofsky just a total, fucking genius?

Aronofsky knows his way around a camera, alright, but everything in the movie is, amazingly, on the page. And unlike the filmmaker's language of jump shots, pace, music, film stock, the novelist's language is just...language. Selby dispenses with pesky, confining rules of grammar and punctuation, using crazy, run-on sentences and run-on paragraphs and sometimes run-on pages to lay bare the urgent, non-stop hum of desperate junkymind. You clock the descent even you're drawn into the story, with the result that each step downward, while horrifying, makes perfect sense.

Like any language vastly different from our current one, it takes some will and effort to get into Requiem. I liken it to Shakespeare, where, even if the actors are really great and the production top-notch, the first 10 minutes can feel like a bunch of well-dressed chimps nattering on in some imaginary, improvisitory language with too much sound and fury: they might as well be hurling poop at the audience to communicate their feelings. Then, once your give yourself over to the experience, your ears adjust and it's almost like were listening to things at the wrong speed before the curtain rose.

It's a difficult journey, this trip into the heart of despair. I didn't need to read it for the cautionary tale, either: I grew up with a healthy fear of addiction and the idea of using needles for sport is anathema. The capacity for self-delusion, though, is a thing it never hurts to be reminded of. Especially in these times of wild-eyed lying by them what's in charge (and willful looking away by them what's not), it's good to dip into some serious truth via this grim, almost-30-year-old paean to it.

xxx
c

UPDATE (12/3/08): In a shameless and transparent act of caving, I've been replacing book and DVD links with Amazon affiliate links throughout the site. I MAKE MONEY WHEN YOU CLICK ON THESE. Like, a full 1/4 cent or something. Whatever. I'm happy if you borrow it from a friend or the library, or buy it used (I like half.com and alibris online) or, praise Jeebus!, from your local independent dead tree retailer. Seriously. The main thing is, read. Absorb. Enjoy. Pass it on.

Never work with kids or animals

me & the green giant At the beginning of my commercial career, I worked a lot with semi-animate objects: the Jack-In-The-Box antenna ball (it chatted me up about the Sourdough Jack and checked out my ass in the tag); the Pets.com puppet (before the dot.com bust sent him skidding downwards into low-rent car insurance commercials); the Jolly Green Giant, way, waaaaaay back when (see left above).

In general, I get cast as the Quirky Chick or the Freaky Neighbor or the Funny Mom, which puts me in a lot of off-kilter situations; I'm the wife calmly sipping coffee as her kitchen is jacked up 25º on a hydraulic lift, or the skinny broad in the conga line, or the clueless Gap-casual mom singing "Polly Wolly Doodle" off-key as my (teenaged!) son bangs his head slowly against the back-seat window. I make fun of myself, willingly, joyously, to keep myself in expensive graphics software and even more expensive health insurance.

In other words, I have long since given up any foolish notions of my day job taking me to exotic locations with the Eiffel Tower or breathtaking waterfalls in the background and some soap-opera-looking love interest in the foreground; I go to Santa Clarita stages and parking lots in Gardena and work with fat, balding guys* (if I'm Gap-casual mom) or the usual wagon of carnival freaks (if I'm playing Office Lady or Wacko Next-Door-Neighbor Lady or other garden-variety, Everywoman type). More often than not, any time I spend in hair-&-makeup is to remove the bags under my eyes, if the director even wants that much done. On a shoot for a business product last year, I overheard one assistant wardrobe stylist say to another, "Oh, don't pull anything too cute; she's supposed to be from the Midwest."**

But yesterday, I hit rock bottom. Not only did I drive my own baggy-eyed self out to that glamour capital of the world, Pasadena, at 5am (on Sunday, people, the Lord's day, the day of rest), I did it to play a librarian, in no makeup, with a kid, a mouse, a snake, a kitten, a rabbit, a gecko***, a big flappy bird of some type AND (drumroll, please) a baby alligator.

Yes, a live, baby alligator. And I was standing between it and the rabbit, for scale and no residuals (it was a PSA).

And I did it willingly. Joyously.

For the insurance and the money, yes, but because I really do love it, working with smart, funny people, making a film (albeit a really short one to sell something), playing someone else.

Playing. I love to play. I love that my work is something I would do for free. It's why I potter around with two-cent design jobs and two-person shows and this here blog when I'm not dressed up in the frumpiest clothes the studio wardrobe departments have to offer: these ventures don't feel like work; they feel like play. I'm hoping I get lucky with them, too. I'm hoping that my electronic noodling will eventually turn into some kind of self-sustaining thing, and in turn lead me to the next weird hobby I didn't know I couldn't live without.

Because the greatest way there is to make a living is the way that doesn't feel like work at all, it feels like play.

Even when there are no carnivorous reptiles in sight.

xxx c

*Unless the commercial is for a food/beverage product, in which case there isn't a fat person in sight (Teamster portion of the crew excepting).

**This kind of behavior has really stepped up since I started checking the "40+" box. Maybe if I stop checking it, I'll go back to at least wanting to buy the wardrobe off the spot. I really miss those souvenir half-off khakis.

***The gecko worked in a different scene, so I did not actually meet the gecko, but I did meet the kid, the mouse (they poop a lot...tiny, little poops), the snake, the kitten, the rabbit, the big flappy bird, the baby alligator and a shitload of animal wranglers.

Searches, we get searchesâ„¢

searchesWherein we occasionally divulge the strange, stray searches that lead the lost to the Land of (Broken) Promise in the Form of an Endless Loop, a.k.a. communicatrix. What Yes or No question would you ask a person that lies or tells the truth in order to save your life? (Ask.com)

"Am I on fire?"

truth about sparkletts (Google)

Sparkletts...water...is...people!!!

weight loss with strong and noisy bowel movement in the wee hours of the morning (Yahoo)

Hey...am I being Punk'd?

fifty dollar chiffon prom dresses (MSN)

Oh, Mary! Christmas came early this year!

gay polyamory (Google Blogsearch)

Well, it says it right on my business card: "Communicatrix: Punditry on polyamory, gay and straight."

pictures celebrity bear breasts (MSN)

Whoa, Smokey has man-boobs?

happy ending shit hammered lower east side (Yahoo)

If that's a happy ending, remind me to steer clear of you on a bad day.

hermes scarf authentication (MSN)

Rub it on Catherine Deneuve. If she turns green, it's iron.

how much do "commercial actors make" money (Google)

Wait, they're "supposed to pay" me?

perverted private sites personals (Yahoo)

Yes, please.

xxx c

Quotation of the Day: Shacking Up Edition

Y'all thought I forgot about List Wednesday again, didn't you? From The Alternatives to Marriage site...

"The Ten Most Common Ways Unmarried People Introduce Their Partners (in order of frequency):*

1. partner (also life partner, unmarried partner, domestic partner) 2. boyfriend/girlfriend 3. significant other or S.O. 4. the person's name without a descriptive word 5. friend 6. husband/wife 7. roommate or housemate 8. lover 9. spouse 10. sweetie or sweetheart"

xxx c

* according to interviews conducted by Marshall Miller and Dorian Solot for Unmarried to Each Other: The Essential Guide to Living Together as an Unmarried Partner. To read the full list of over forty words unmarried people use to introduce their partners, check out Unmarried to Each Other.

alt.marriage

bride mannequinsThe farther away I get from my (failed) marriage, the more clearly I'm able to see it. My own particular marriage, yes, but also my relationship (no pun intended) to the institution itself, which usually fell somewhere on the spectrum between "cautiously optimistic" and "no fucking way." I can't say I'm agin' it entirely, because I'm not; I'm sure it works great for some people. Somewhere. A couple of them (ha!), anyway. But more often I've seen (me, personally, Colleen) how marriage doesn't work, how, instead of becoming a safe harbor of commitment within which two people can grow and flourish without fear of capricious abandonment, it becomes a justification stick couples take turns with to beat one another, and even themselves, about the psyche (metaphorically speaking, of course; hitting = bad). Even the marriages that look good from the outside may be rotten on the inside; I couldn't believe the number of people who were shocked, shocked, I tell you!, to hear that my own marriage, which had been rocky for years, was ending.

Anyway.

I'm not here to crap on marriage. Well, mostly I'm not. Like I said, I think two mutually consenting adults should be free to do whatever the hell they want as long as it's not going to hurt anyone else or significantly damage my property. Note I did not say "piss off anyone", you see where I'm heading with this, because there are plenty of things two mutually consenting adults could do (in the privacy of their own home, even) that would send certain other people into fits of apoplexy, like, oh, say, marrying someone they might have showered beside in the locker room after P.E. instead of someone they met, oh, say, in a titty bar. Or a church meeting. Or online. Or wherever the hell.

BIG HUGE FAT DISCLAIMER: PLEASE NOTE THAT I AM IN NO WAY SAYING THAT CHURCHES OF ANY STRIPE SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO DICTATE GENDER APPROPRIATENESS VIS-A-VIS MARRIAGE (OR GENERAL FRATERNIZATION AMONG THE RANKS). THANK YOU; OBRIGADO; IN NOMINE PATRE, ETC.

What really pisses me off about marriage is what pisses me off about most things that stick in my craw: it's not fair. Specifically, it's not fair that some people (i.e., the ones who might meet in a titty bar) get to do it while others (the ones who might shower together after P.E.) can't. Period. I mean, I have lots and lots of issues about marriage, but I freely admit those are more about me hating the sound of the cage door slamming shut than Marriage as it might be practiced by non-lunatics (who, for the record, come in both the titty bar and P.E.-showering variety).

No, the fairness thing is different. It's not fair that my wonderful friends O-Lan and Halldor can be married while my other wonderful friends Ann and Susie cannot. They've been together the same amount of time; longer, even. They own property. They're raising a terrific kid.

Moreover, Ann and Susie probably wouldn't give a crap about getting married even if they could. They're not exactly flag-wavers for most of the dominant paradigms, Susie's corporate gig notwithstanding (well, how else do people afford health insurance?). But that's not the point; the point is (all together now): It's. Not. Fair.

So I'm clicking around on the SAG Pension & Health site, waiting for the nice lady on the other end of the line to give me authorization for 10 more shrink visits since a certain anniversary has apparently triggered some sort of mini-meltdown, and I stumble on a motherlode of links about alternative partnerships, and the creation, dissolution and legality of such. Makes sense: if you're crazyy enough to be an actor, chances are you're queer, off-kilter, or both.

My favorite of the sites, the Alternatives to Marriage Project (a.k.a. unmarried.org), has its own mongo cache of fun links, including: "Famous People in Unmarried Relationships (Susan Sarandon and Tim Robbins are only the beginning!)"; jokes ("why don't melons marry? they cantaloupe"); and separate sections on being polyamorous and/or marriagefree ("as free as the wiiiind bloooows...").

44899508_beda70a2b2But my favorite-favorite link brought me to something I'd never heard about: The Marriage Boycott. Basically, The Marriage Boycott is a solidarity movement: straight couples refusing to marry until gay couples are allowed the same privileges. Which, at first glance sounds kind of silly, who's gonna care, right? Until you think it through, at which point is gets kind of genius: it makes the personal the political in a really huge way, which can be useful in (a), converting potential grandparents who are sticklers for their offspring's offspring being legitimate to the Side of Good or (b), getting Aunt Agatha and the mah-jongg crew to wake up and smell the Sanka.

Of course, to be maximally effective it'd help to have some extreme types sign on, your Town & Country demo, your Tri-Delt debs, your future ex-Mrs. Donald Trumps, but every little bit helps.

Anyone care to propose? I'm ready and willing to turn you down.

For the cause, of course.

xxx c

Flickr photos "Drunken Brides" and "Drunken Bridesmaid" by LightsOutFilms

Quotation of the Day

"Oh, and on the The Matrix: The Matrix is simply a metaphor. Don't see The Matrix (or do), don't read any book mentioned (or do), don't read this blog (or do). Simply follow that which is pulling in you and drawing you forth. Taking the red pill means yield to whatever the outcome is of that pull and spontaneously being your own experiment in truth." , Evelyn Rodriguez, Crossroads Dispatches

Quotation of the Day: "Me, Too" Edition

I'm inspired by new people every day, certainly, but most of all by artists who are living out their dreams and constantly creating and thinking and offer as much by their example of how they live their lives as their work itself." , "lustylady", in the comments section of a Lifehacker post on who inspires you

Rhymes with "sad"

I've alluded to some of the mishegoss this year that's contributed to my overall tension level, but (mostly) for legal reasons, I've avoided discussing what I'm sure has been the main culprit: the fallout from my father's death two years ago this week. Well, two years ago today, actually, but who's counting? I wasn't. Really. I swear. These things, these sad or scary or horrendous events, must be embedded in us on some cellular level. Because if you'd asked me right up until I started writing this why I was feeling so edgy, so crappy, so restless/listless/angry/frustrated/frightened, after an initial "I dunno"-type disclaimer I would have rattled off a huge list of badness, both real (money woes, work fears, lack of exercise) and imagined (talent flown the coop, ability to write a cohesive sentence AWOL, general pending doom).

But then I read Neil Kramer's delightful and funny and eloquent spilling of his first day "back" from full-time grieving of his own father's death and it shook something loose inside of me. Of course, my own spilling feels about as charming as vomit, but it must out, so here we are.

I had a complicated relationship with my father. I idolized him in many ways, and in many ways he was beyond worthy of it. Seriously. He was an extraordinarily generous man, both with his time and his money. I've lost count of the people I've met over the years who, upon confirming that I was my father's daughter, rattled on about how my father had gotten them this meeting or this job or this promotion. He was constantly flying around the country or on the phone, or flying around the country on the phone, getting things done.

And the money. After years of struggling, he was very successful in the last years of his life, and while he continued to live the same peanut-butter-and-boxer-shorts lifestyle he always had, everyone else reaped the benefit of his success. He supported his own parents in what some would call extravagent style for the last 15 years of their life, letting his proud father maintain the fiction that it was all a loan to be paid back at some later date. He paid for my mother's funeral when she died 10 years ago even though they despised each other, because he knew my sister and I couldn't afford it and didn't want to have to ask our grandmother (who could) to foot the bill. Don't get me started on my stepmother's expenditures; let's just say she wanted for nothing, and if she exercises even minimal restraint, will live out the rest of a very long life doing the same.

On the other hand...

Okay. Look. I know nobody's perfect. I knew it about my dad even when he was alive. I mean, let's face it: I'd both reached adulthood, middle-aged adulthood, and been shrunk (twice) by the time he died, a year ago today, at 70. I knew he was a workaholic; I knew he had avoidance issues. I knew we were never going to have the kind of relationship I would really have liked and worse, the kind that deep down, I sensed he would really have liked if he'd been strong/brave/weird enough try. I knew all of this because, self-exploration and shrinkage notwithstanding, I was...am...so very, very much like him, both physically (the Crohn's, the eczema, the big-nostriled honker) and temperamentally. Ask my ex-husband, he'll tell you. And he'd be right.

But after I got our family disease, I started making some unorthodox (for our family, anyway) choices, truth over fiction, time over power, love over money. I'd been paying lip service to The Path for years, but I'd finally decided to walk it. Ironically, embracing the part of me that wasn't like my father made it easier to accept the parts that were, and to love him for the real, live, flawed, loving human being that he was. Or at least, I thought it did, until he died and the proverbial other shoe dropped.

I can't get into the details of it yet because, as I mentioned earlier, there are a few legal loose ends that need tying up first. For now, let's just say that Dad wasn't as strong and brave and tough a man as we thought he was and that getting down with that truth isn't as easy as I thought it would be.

Let's also say that for as bewildered and angry and hurt as his death and the fallout from it have left me, they have also shown me that while I am my father's daughter, I am also my own person, and a much stronger, braver, tougher person than I realized.

Sad. Mad. Glad.

I miss you, Dad.

xxx c

TECHNORATI TAGS: , , ,

Searches, we get searchesâ„¢

searchesWoodwork squeaks and out come the freaks...to communicatrix! show me some chicken curry embroidery designs (Google)

...and I'll show you some really twisted Indian chicks.

airbrushed tutus (Google)

When 14 yards of frothy, pink tulle just isn't femme enough.

hippie skivvies Jesters (Google)

I thought dirty hippies went commando.

killer scary clown clip art (Google)

As opposed to the soft, gentle clown clip art that quietly lulls one to sleep.

romance fiction harlequins (Google)

Must be that "Bodice-Ripper" tag I added last week.

recipe for baked chicken breasts and cream cheese - Heloise column (MSN)

Show of hands: who thinks Heloise is a honky?

CHEKOVIAN LIFESTYLES (Google)

Coming soon to a newsstandski near you.

RuckSack HA White Cover (Capacity 90 Lit) (Yahoo)

Communicatrix.comâ„¢: home of all your camping and outdoor needs!

credit cards suck (Google Images)

Click. No, really, click.

heloise odor stinky toilet solutions (AOL)

When you're done with those chicken-'n'-cream cheese roll-ups...

xxx c

Have you missed List Wednesday? I know I have.

Things I've found so far during Project Apartment De-Grossify: 1. A manila envelope containing the Final Cut Pro discs I lost two years ago.

2. A bunch of those little rubber feet that go under printers, paper cutters and small household appliances.

3. Dirt. Lots and lots of dirt.

4. My college diploma*.

5. Extra (!) cords around my computer that plug into nothing.

6. communicatrix: The Benihana Years

7. One upside-down cockroach near the fridge (bleh...)

8. My grandfather's (unpublished) novel about the not-so-golden days of radio.

9. The antenna for my wireless router.

10. Jesus in a Tortilla**

xxx c

*Has anyone else had the balls to toss this? Talk about your expensive tchotchkes...

**Okay, since this was given to me by a client this week, I didn't really find it. But come on...you totally want one.